Modelling,Genome Wide Association Studies and Blog links

Loads of Reading!

Modelling Reviews:

http://www.nature.com/nrg/series/modelling/index.html

Genome Wide Association Studies Reviews:
http://www.nature.com/nrg/series/gwas/index.html

Also a good Nature Molecular Systems Biology blog called Seven Stones:http://blogs.nature.com/sevenstones/

Related articles

Enhanced by Zemanta

Ecological Model Mystery Solution Proposed

Fishing in the Maldives

Image via Wikipedia

In 1972 physicist Robert May of Oxford University developed a ground-breaking mathematical model that represented the relationship between ecosystem stability and diversity.It proved that sufficiently large or complex ecological networks have a probability of persisting that is close to zero,directly contradicting previous expectations.According to May’s model, ecosystems that harbor large numbers of interacting species would necessarily be extremely unstable–so unstable that even slight perturbations, such as variable weather and environmental conditions, would be enough to trigger massive extinctions within them. Therein lies a paradox: According to May’s modeling, the persistence in nature of the complex ecosystems such as coral reefs and junglethat contain many species co-existing and interacting  should be exceedingly improbable.

But now, Stefano Allesina and Si Tang, both of the University of Chicago, have solved that vexing modeling mystery, and have thereby laid the groundwork for improvements in the modeling of complex ecosystems to environmental change.The researchers’ work,  funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), is published in this week’s issue of Nature. (link)

Remarkably, Allesina says that he and Tang cracked the biodiversity mystery without supercomputers or other high-tech instruments that are so frequently at the core of current biological discoveries: “We did the necessary calculations with just a pen and paper after finding a 1988 article on quantum physics that gave us the key to crack the problem.”

In their Nature paper, Allesina and Tang explain why May’s results do not accurately describe ecosystems in which predator-prey relationships are prevalent. Allesina explains: “May’s model assumes that any two species in a large ecological network interact with one another at random, and without any consideration of the specific type of interaction between them, whether it is a predator-prey relationship, a mutualistic relationship or a competitive relationship.”But in their recent research, Allesina and Tang modeled ecosystems in which species consume each other in addition to interacting with one another as competitors or mutualists. Their results explain why large numbers of species thrive instead of necessarily going extinct as predicted by May’s model. This advance provides the foundation for the development of increasingly sophisticated analyses of ecosystem responses to environmental change.

Allesina believes that it is predator/prey relationships (not competitor or mutualistic relationships) that provide the necessary stability for almost infinite numbers of species to exist in ecosystems. They do so by keeping the size of species populations in check at supportable levels. Allesina explains, “When prey are high, predators increase and reduce the number of prey by predation. When predators are low, prey decrease and thus reduce the number of predators by starvation. These predator/prey relationships thereby promote stability in ecosystems and enable them to maintain large numbers of species.”

Allesina says that May’s model mixed various types of species interactions but could not represent these relationships accurately because of technical modeling constraints that he and Tang overcame.

Allesina says that he and Tang intend to further improve their ecosystem model by embedding into it well-known interactions that exist between particular species. He also says that the insights gleaned through this study may be used to improve models of other types of networks that are unrelated to ecology, such as various types of gene regulatory networks and chemical reactions.

Adapted from:eurekaalert

Nature Paper:Stability Criteria for Complex ecosystems

Enhanced by Zemanta

R-loops break walls of gene silencing

From :http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=10165

Researchers at the University of California, Davis, have figured out how the human body keeps essential genes switched “on” and silences the vast stretches of genetic repeats and “junk” DNA.

Frédéric Chédin, associate professor in the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, describes the research in a paper published today (March 1) in the journal Molecular Cell. The work could lead to treatments for lupus and other autoimmune diseases, by reversing the gene-silencing process known as cytosine methylation.

“R-loops” are the key, say graduate student Paul Ginno, Chédin and colleagues. The loops emerge in the RNA transcription process in DNA sections that are rich in cytosine and guanine, the C and G in the four-letter DNA code. These C and G stretches serve as “on” switches, or promoters, for about 60 percent of human genes.

Scientists have known since the 1980s that these so-called CG island promoters are not subject to methylation. But, Chédin said, the mechanism has been a long-standing mystery.

The UC Davis researchers built a catalog of almost 8,000 CG islands in the human genome, studied their DNA sequences and found the CG sequences to be skewed toward having one strand of the double helix rich in guanine, and the complementary strand rich in cytosine.

Then, in RNA transcription, the G-rich RNA remains stably bound to a C-rich DNA strand, forcing the G-rich DNA strand into a loop — which then prevents methylation.

DNA methylation is considered part of the new field of epigenetics, which studies inheritable genetic changes that are not directly coded in the DNA sequence. However, the new work shows that, at least at CG islands, the epigenetic state is determined by the DNA sequence.

Scientists know that reduced methylation of DNA plays a key role in triggering autoimmunity in lupus, Chédin said. However, the molecular events behind this DNA under-methylation have been unclear.

“Our work establishes that excessive R-loop formation may drive under-methylation and autoimmunity,” Chédin said.

Co-authors: Paul Lott, graduate student; Holly Christensen, undergraduate; and Ian Korf, associate professor in the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and the Genome Center.

The National Institutes of Health and the Foundation for Prader-Willi Research supported the project.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Interesting Blog

An interesting blog on science and biomedicine from a variety of perspectives including PhD students,senior researchers and artists.. http://wellcometrust.wordpress.com/

The Insanity Virus-Schizophrenia Could Be Caused By A Virus

virus
Image by twenty_questions via Flickr

“Steven and David Elmore were born identical twins, but their first days in this world could not have been more different. David came home from the hospital after a week. Steven, born four minutes later, stayed behind in the ICU. For a month he hovered near death in an incubator, wracked with fever from what doctors called a dangerous viral infection. Even after Steven recovered, he lagged behind his twin. He lay awake but rarely cried. When his mother smiled at him, he stared back with blank eyes rather than mirroring her smiles as David did. And for several years after the boys began walking, it was Steven who often lost his balance, falling against tables or smashing his lip.

Those early differences might have faded into distant memory, but they gained new significance in light of the twins’ subsequent lives. By the time Steven entered grade school, it appeared that he had hit his stride. The twins seemed to have equalized into the genetic carbon copies that they were: They wore the same shoulder-length, sandy-blond hair. They were both B+ students. They played basketball with the same friends. Steven Elmore had seemingly overcome his rough start. But then, at the age of 17, he began hearing voices…”

Read the rest of this great article at Discover Magazine Online.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Falling in love is ‘more scientific than you think’…

‘A new meta-analysis study conducted by Syracuse University Professor Stephanie Ortigue is getting attention around the world. The groundbreaking study, “The Neuroimaging of Love,” reveals falling in love can elicit not only the same euphoric feeling as using cocaine, but also affects intellectual areas of the brain. Researchers also found falling in love only takes about a fifth of a second.’

Read the rest of the article by clicking here

 

 

 

http://bit.ly/c7oy0b

Scientists suggest that cancer is purely man-made

Mummy Louvre
Image via Wikipedia

“Cancer is a modern, man-made disease caused by environmental factors such as pollution and diet, a study by University of Manchester scientists has strongly suggested.

The study of remains and literature from ancient Egypt and and earlier periods – carried out at Manchester’s KNH Centre for Biomedical Egyptology and published in Nature Reviews Cancer – includes the first histological diagnosis of cancer in an Egyptian mummy.

Excerpt from article at physorg.com.

View the paper in NatureReviews by clicking here.

Enhanced by Zemanta